1
Projects / 2015 lrd/led duner
« on: January 28, 2015, 11:31:44 PM »Quote from: mandom250r;49502
nope, why you want it?
oh god NO ....LOL
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
nope, why you want it?
2 oz raises it 5 points on which scale? The motored method or the research method? I am very skeptical of such advertisements based upon my past experience. The motored method is the one that really means anything.
My experience over the last 40 years on octane booster has not been good. Any of the old boosters that raised the octane 5 to 10 points or even close to to what they advertise are now illegal and you needed to ware a Hazmat suit while handling them. They say that handling these chemicals can cause dain bramage.:cocksure:
Those old boosters that half way worked cost as much to treat a gallon of fuel as it did to just buy race fuel. If high octane race fuel could be made from pump fuel by adding a few ounces of the booster the race gas manufactures would also be doing it.
It is always better to use fuel that is a few octane points higher that what the engine needs because you may not always get 91 octane as graded or rated by your engine when hot and under full load, even though it is advertised as 91 octane. I have challenged the fuel quality at .a particular gas station and days later the state will come to the station a take a sample and take it to a test lab and test it. The octane rating has always tested higher that what is posted using (R+M)/2 method. I think that the(R+M)/2 method of rating is used so that the fuel will meet or exceed what is advertised.
The problem with the (R+M)/2 method is R means the research test method and the M means the Motored test method. An engine under full load agrees more with the motored method and not the research method when determining the fuels level of detonation resistance.
Example of: octane rating = (R+M)/2 = 90
Let R=95
M=85
octane is 90
Now let:
R=85
M=95
octane is 90
Both of the above test will meet the octane rating of 90 but when M= 85 you will have severe detonation problems because your engine thinks it is 85 octane. When M=95 your fuel will behave in your engine (resist detonation) like you are running 95 octane fuel.
Found another one from a different supplierthat's a nice part.....
http://www.regulatorrectifier.com/catalog/1986-1988-Honda-TRX250R-Stator-Wiring-Harness
Looks really nice
Picked up a Laeger wide cr500 flip top chassis, linkage, PEP ZPS rear shock, PEP ZPS LT fronts, Laeger LT +3 front end and airbox. Also came across some nice Baldwin stuff to go with my graphics and hubs.
Where's Silverlake??is it really made out of silver?
I think in the video you can see a o2 bung in the expansion chamber
I have a 38MM Keihin Carb with the numbers of PWK S66AO LA, I know it'syou have the right info with the s66 (38mm air striker) as stated get in touch with sudco im assuming you want the rubber rebuild, the numbers you have will be all you need to get the right kit
an air-striker but I can't find any information about it. Looking to get the
right rebuild kit for it...
Thanks
Personally, I wouldn't go with a lighter flywheel. Most people say stay away from the Ricky Stator brand of electrical components.
Stick to OEM 250R or go to the CR250 ignitions