Not sure where u are getting your information, but the idea that someone NEEDS a chemical is merely an opinion, no matter if it is a professional opinion or not, it is still opinion, and bares no revelance on its addictiveness.
Jesse, you are right. A doctor recommends chemo to a leukemia patient in hopes it cures them. The patient does not need it, but it is a helpful tool in surviving. Add or adhd meds are not "needed," but rather helpful tools for students to get through the school/work day, and do so with more success. Your argument is invalid. But please, try again to explain to the world how something you've never used or experienced(for the intended reasons, not just to get high or stay up all night for fun), is bad for them. Ill be over here with the experience and knowledge.
To everyone elses comments. These meds are for exactly what you're saying. To help you focus on the things you need to, but dont really care too. I hated science and SS, but they're needed for a diploma. I hate having to do continued ed classes for my insurance licenses, and if i cared to hear them and pay attention, id probably need something to help me pay attention. Unfortunately in the real world, you cant just "find out what your son is interested in and loves to do. Then let him go do it." At somepoint in life from now until college, he will need to to focus on something other than that. If i could get away with doing what i love all day everyday, i'd be in bed with my wife 16hrs, riding 8 hrs, sleeping zero, because i hate sleeping.
I agree with seeing multiple doctors, getting multiple opinions absolutely, but dont be so closed off to the idea, and definitely dont get a divorce over it. It doesnt make you "a tough guy" by being anti adhd meds.