Author Topic: airbox lid VS outerwear lid (Read 3179 times)

dem3500 · « **on:** March 30, 2016, 10:47:45 AM »

i ride trails and race XC. i cant decide if i want to stick with a airbox lid and snorkel or go with an outerwear hydrophobic lid. i do hit water and having a lid and the ability to submerge my quad is awesome. it gives me an edge up on a lot of other racers cause i can just blast the water and not worry about it but the setup i currently have is hookey and im revamping my box for this season. how good are the hydrophobic covers? i can watch videos all day long with people puddling water on top of the cloth but how does that translate to the real world? if i blast water and the box goes under water (im keeping the snorkel on it) is it going to keep most of the water out of the box or not? should i just keep a lid and stay safe? this is an aluminum airbox and fabing/welding is no problem for me so really the sky is the limit in that aspect.

rablack21 · « **Reply #1 on:** March 30, 2016, 11:22:50 AM »

The outerwear lids are good, but they WILL NOT keep all the water out of the box. I run that setup on my mx quad because some track owners water the tracks excessively. It does a great job at helping keep the water out of my air box. But if I hit A LOT of water (like you do in XC), it WILL get into the box. I would stick with the airbox lid. The little extra power that you would gain is not worth what you would be sacrificing. Just my opinion.

dem3500 · « **Reply #2 on:** March 30, 2016, 11:25:58 AM »

Quote from: rablack21;66140

The outerwear lids are good, but they WILL NOT keep all the water out of the box. I run that setup on my mx quad because some track owners water the tracks excessively. It does a great job at helping keep the water out of my air box. But if I hit A LOT of water (like you do in XC), it WILL get into the box. I would stick with the airbox lid. The little extra power that you would gain is not worth what you would be sacrificing. Just my opinion.

that was kind of what i was thinking. i have a 363 pv so as far as loosing a little bit of power i have plenty more where that came from haha

Tbone07 · « **Reply #3 on:** March 30, 2016, 11:29:35 AM »

I would just swap out your setup depending on track conditions for that day.

If I had the ability to run the snorkel and lid setup then I would have actually finished a full 3 laps in the last GNCC I did. Instead I swamped the motor

dem3500 · « **Reply #4 on:** March 30, 2016, 11:35:45 AM »

Quote from: Tbone07;66142

I would just swap out your setup depending on track conditions for that day.

If I had the ability to run the snorkel and lid setup then I would have actually finished a full 3 laps in the last GNCC I did. Instead I swamped the motor

id rather not switch up for track conditions. thats too much work that i dont have time for. both my girls race with me and getting the time to prepare 3 quads is a daunting task in itself haha. ill set it up and leave it. hell i dont even re-jet more than once throughout the season lol. sucks you swamped the motor! especially in a GNCC!

Tbone07 · « **Reply #5 on:** March 30, 2016, 09:36:25 PM »

Quote from: dem3500;66143

id rather not switch up for track conditions. thats too much work that i dont have time for. both my girls race with me and getting the time to prepare 3 quads is a daunting task in itself haha. ill set it up and leave it. hell i dont even re-jet more than once throughout the season lol. sucks you swamped the motor! especially in a GNCC!

I'm not saying remove the whole snorkel tract. Just swap lids depending on conditions